Volume XXVI, Issue 66 |

Introduction

Psychedelic treatments are gaining traction for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, but to what extent can the results be generalised to apply to the wider population? Questions persist about whether psychedelic researchers are doing enough to recruit a representative proportion of minority groups in their clinical trials to prove efficacy for all. 

Why does there need to be a focus on psychedelic trial design?

Psychedelic clinical trials are pushing the frontiers of modern psychiatric research. Six primary psychedelic categories are being investigated for therapeutic use – psilocybin, ketamine, MDMA, DMT, LSD and 5-MeO-DMT – and are currently being trialled for substance use disorders (SUDs), depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Levels of interest and investment to support development of psychedelics have increased in recent years.

Psychedelics are at a critical inflection point, with increasing investment, a growing body of clinical evidence and evolution of regulatory pathways driving strong growth in clinical development activity (see Figure 1).    

What diversity issues exist in trial populations?

Positive momentum behind development in this space must continue in order to generate clinical evidence that is both robust and generalisable to the broader population, to support regulatory approval and subsequent reimbursement. The intentional inclusion in trials of a diverse patient population, defined as participants who differ from one another based on factors such as race, ethnicity and gender, is crucial for ensuring this generalisability. 

A deep dive into psychedelic clinical trial data reveals that trial populations consistently fall short of being representative of the broader population with respect to race and ethnicity, potentially limiting the applicability of results. It is worth noting that the same issue is not present with respect to male and female representation, which is broadly equivalent.

The American Psychiatric Association recognised this shortfall in 2024, and released a public letter stating a need for a more diverse group of patients in Lykos’s clinical trials of MDMA for the treatment of PTSD. The letter also expressed caution to the US Food and Drug Administration about generalising the results of the clinical trials to populations not represented adequately in the study.1

Why is this important?

Race, ethnicity, sex and gender can all significantly impact the way different people respond to the same medication. In fact, over the past few decades, several drugs have been withdrawn from the market because of adverse sex-based effects that were not accounted for in clinical trials. Furthermore, compelling examples exist of variation in drug metabolism and toxicity due to race and ethnicity.2 With a wave of new psychedelic treatments reaching the later stages of clinical trials and nearing regulatory approval, the scientific community must keep a watchful eye on how generalisable these studies claim to be. Without showing evidence of clinical efficacy and safety for an appropriately diverse sample that reflects the real-world population, we cannot be sure how well these promising assets will work once approved and available to all.

Racial diversity

Minority and ethnic groups are underrepresented in psychedelic medicine studies. An analysis of the ethnic breakdown of trial participants in 20 psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy studies from 2006 to 2023 revealed that almost 80% were non-Hispanic, white individuals.3  Of the c.22% of participants who were ethnic minorities, c.12% were either Black, Asian or Hispanic/Latino, and the remainder were either mixed, of Indigenous descent or another race (see Figure 2). 

These figures appear to suggest that trial populations to date have fallen short of providing a representative sample of the general population, with minority groups generally underrepresented in psychedelic studies.

Deep dive: US clinical trials

Examining the picture in the US in more detail, we find that the representation of minority groups in psychedelic studies is lower than in the general population and in psychiatric drug trial participants overall (see Figure 3).4 This suggests that any structural issues in trial recruitment are specific to psychedelics rather than a function of the disease space. 

What are the causes, and what can be done?

Issues with diagnostic approach: The existing diagnostic paradigm for psychiatric disorders, such as the DSM-5, inadequately considers the cultural nuances that significantly influence the clinical manifestation of psychopathology in individuals of colour. For example, the current diagnostic criteria for PTSD do not include race-based trauma. Without these culturally inclusive diagnostic criteria, minorities often do not qualify for treatment studies, reducing their overall representation relative to the general population in some studies. 

Unlike in many other psychiatric drug trial designs, researchers in psychedelic studies have not accounted for this inherent bias and thus far have been unable to recruit participant groups that represent greater ethnic diversity.

Ineffective and narrow recruitment methods: Many trial participants are referred from outpatient providers, including physicians and mental health clinicians. These centres typically treat a lower proportion of patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds, as certain factors –  e.g., cultural and social stigma regarding seeking medical help, the cost of physician fees – might prevent individuals in marginalised groups from reaching care. 

If researchers in psychedelic trials sought referrals from providers that accept Medicaid and other forms of affordable healthcare in the US, they would likely experience greater success in recruiting minority ethnic groups.5 Researchers with specific expertise in areas of cultural diversity and the recruitment of people of colour should be included in trial teams, and efforts should be made to recruit more researchers from minority groups into the psychedelic field. 

Increasing the diversity of therapists involved in clinical trials would improve participant recruitment as well as the research itself. Sunstone Therapies, based in Rockville, Maryland, US, is a leading clinical trial centre for psychedelic-assisted therapy in the medical setting, and keen to promote more diverse therapist populations. Manish Agrawal MD, Chief Executive Officer at Sunstone Therapies, says: “Having clear sightlines for understanding perspectives, and investing in diversity, equity and inclusion for therapists, is crucial to the overall health and foundation of research into psychedelic-assisted therapies. We have funded a project with Dana-Farber to identify and understand the opportunities and barriers for Black therapists to engage in this field. We need more initiatives like this across the industry so that we develop culturally informed research designs, training programs and funding opportunities – and can accelerate the diversification and equity of psychedelic research.”

Insufficient incentivisation to overcome hurdles: Many recent psychedelic studies in the US have been privately funded, which means they were not required to conform to National Institutes of Health (NIH) diversity guidelines. The NIH Revitalisation Act of 1993 mandated that all studies supported by NIH funding must carefully consider the proportions of ethnic minorities and women in a study population, ensuring representative numbers compared with the overall population.6 However, in the UK, the Health Research Authority (HRA) has been working with groups of researchers, public contributors and research ethics committees to develop supporting guidance for researchers to consider when designing clinical trials, so that they develop a better understanding of the most effective treatments for different groups of people. 

As government funding and focus increase, further emphasis on recruitment criteria and appropriate demographic representation is anticipated.

Sex and gender diversity

From a gender perspective, trial recruitment has historically been more balanced. Of the 20 psychedelic studies whose demographics were analysed, 58% of the trial participants were female, and the most recent MDMA study contained more females in its sample than males, accurately representing the demographics of the PTSD patient pool.7 Greater female representation in clinical trials will support increased confidence in the safety profile for women, an issue that has historically arisen in trials with disproportionately low female representation.8

However, the historical underrepresentation persists in PTSD research, for example, of transgender and gender-diverse people, who experience trauma and PTSD at higher rates than the general population.9 Including gender-diverse participants in such studies is important for understanding the efficacy of psychedelic therapies for those suffering from gender-based trauma. 

The issue relating to gender extends beyond the recruitment of trial participants and lies more fundamentally in the people leading the psychedelic movement in psychiatry. Of the 46 principal investigators leading Phase 3 psychedelic clinical trials, 76% are male and 24% are female. Unfortunately, this type of imbalance is common across many scientific research fields. When compared with the percentage of female clinical psychiatrists in the US overall, the psychedelic field comes up short once again (see Figure 4). The disparity is even greater when comparing the trial investigators to the number of therapists in the US, where 76% are female. Addressing this disparity will likely facilitate a more balanced interpretation of clinical results, ensuring they are more applicable to the wider population.10

Conclusion

With psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy coming to the forefront of novel psychiatric medicine, the spotlight is on clinical trials to assess whether the drugs are efficacious and safe for the wider population. Although many of these trials have demonstrated clinical efficacy, questions remain over the extent to which the trial results are applicable to the wider, more diverse population at large. 

When it comes to representing ethnic and racial minorities, psychedelic trials have not effectively demonstrated compliance with population-level demographics. To ensure confidence in the potential of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies – their real-world efficacy and safety applicable to the entire general population – psychedelic trials must focus on increasing diversity and inclusion within their sample populations, especially with respect to race and ethnicity. As the psychedelic movement continues to grow and gain momentum, regulatory boards and clinical researchers should consider improving representation to be imperative.

How L.E.K. can help

L.E.K. assists clients with their commercial and growth strategy, supporting them in growing sectors such as psychedelic drugs. Our approach helps organisations consistently make better decisions, deliver improved business performance and create greater shareholder returns.

To find out more and for a further discussion, please contact Adrienne Rivlin, Partner.

A version of this Executive Insights was published in the Autumn 2024 edition of International Clinical Trials.

L.E.K. Consulting is a registered trademark of L.E.K. Consulting. All other products and brands mentioned in this document are properties of their respective owners. © 2024 L.E.K. Consulting

Endnotes
 1S. M. Levin (2024), "Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments—Midomafetamine Capsules." American Psychiatric Association, Rockville.
2M. Coakley (2012), "Dialogues on Diversifying Clinical Trials: Successful Strategies for Engaging Women and Minorities in Clinical Trials." Journal of Women’s Health, vol. 21, pp. 713-716.
3T. Michaels (2018), "Inclusion of People of Colour in Psychedelic Assisted Psychotherapy: A Review of the Literature." BMC Psychiatry, p. 18:245.
4M. Lolic et al. (2021), "US Racial and Ethnic Participation in Global Clinical Trials by Therapeutic Areas." Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1576-1581.
5Williams et al. (2012), "The Role of Ethnic Identity in Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in African Americans." Psychiatry Research, pp. 31-36.
6NIH (1994), "NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research."
7J. Mitchell et al. (2021), "MDMA-Assisted Therapy for Severe PTSD: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study." Nature Medicine, pp. 1025-1033.
8A. Sosinsky et al. (2022), "Enrollment of Female Participants in United States Drug and Device Phase 1-3 Clinical Trials Between 2016 and 2019." Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 115.
9C. Stauffer (2022), "MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy; Inclusion of Transgender and Gender Diverse People in the Frontiers of PTSD Treatment Trials." Frontiers in Psychiatry.
10Jill A. Fisher and Marci D. Cottingham (2022), "Gendered Logics of Biomedical Research: Women in U.S. Phase I Clinical Trials." Social Problems, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 492-509.

Questions about our latest thinking?

Related Insights