Market opportunity and demand
The largest opportunities in professional cyber services lie in governance, risk and compliance (GRC) and architecture and design. These service lines command significant market spend as organisations invest in having a secure IT infrastructure design to protect against cyber threats while ensuring scalability and resilience.
Aligning cybersecurity policies with business objectives to achieve robust risk management, mitigation and regulatory adherence is another key area of spend.
Revenue predictability and reoccurrence
High reoccurrence is a key driver of predictable revenues in cyber services. Assurance/audits and pen testing are highly reoccurring, fuelled by regulatory audits and compliance mandates. GRC services also exhibit strong reoccurrence, with governance projects being ad hoc (every few years), while risk management and compliance require continuous engagement. Architecture and design improvements follow a more periodic cycle, driven by large-scale infrastructure upgrades rather than ongoing needs.
Although individual organisations may increase or decrease their spending on professional cybersecurity services from year to year, overall market demand remains stable. This is because companies move through different phases of cybersecurity maturity — ramping up, optimising or scaling back — at different times, which evens out fluctuations at the broader market level.
Outsourcing rate
Outsourcing in cybersecurity is growing across most service lines, driven by specialised talent shortages, cost efficiency and regulatory requirements. Pen testing and assurance/audits are particularly mandated for third-party validation, making them prime candidates for outsourcing. However, architecture and design upgrades experience stable levels of outsourcing, as organisations prefer to retain in-house capability over critical security architecture elements.
Scope for differentiation
The degree of differentiation across service lines is shaped by three key factors:
- Vertical/sector expertise. Understanding industry-specific regulations, business operations and data flows (e.g. in the energy sector, deep familiarity with IEC protocols; in manufacturing, expertise in SCADA/PLC security and knowledge of production workflows)
- Technical capabilities. Certifications, subject-matter expertise, knowledge of specialised security frameworks
- OT expertise. Knowledge of OT systems (e.g. SCADA, PLC, DCS and RTU) as well as industrial communication protocols and networks (e.g. Modbus, DNP3 and Profinet)
The architecture and design area offers the greatest scope for differentiation, as expertise in secure system design requires a deep understanding of sector-specific IT and OT configurations, unique operational risks and industry-specific attack vectors.
GRC and assurance/audits also provide moderate differentiation, where strong regulatory expertise and technical competency in identifying critical vulnerabilities create competitive advantage.
The winning playbook in OT cybersecurity
A vendor’s right to win within OT cybersecurity is underpinned by deep technical OT expertise; vertical-specific knowledge of OT systems, regulations and the threat landscape; and highly skilled talent with sector-relevant experience.
- Deep, technical OT expertise. Deep technical knowledge of OT systems, as well as industrial communication protocols and networks, is essential for cybersecurity vendors to identify and understand the security vulnerabilities in their clients’ IT/OT stack and to effectively advise on how best to harden their security posture through improved security architecture, practices, vulnerability assessments and workflows.
- Vertical-specific knowledge of OT systems, regulations and the threat landscape. Different sectors often have unique OT environments and associated challenges and threat vectors (e.g. risk associated with real-time system availability in aviation or ransomware threats in hospital operations). Having a deep understanding of such industry-specific applications and configurations of OT environments, operational risks and threat vectors — as well as cybersecurity frameworks and regulations — is crucial for vendors to deliver high-quality professional cybersecurity services.
- Highly skilled talent with sector-relevant experience. Vendors must assemble teams with deep expertise in specific industries such as aviation, telecommunications and utilities. This enables them to win and deliver high-quality work that aligns their cybersecurity solutions and services to sector-specific risks, regulations and operational realities — subsequently establishing credibility and trust in the OT cybersecurity services space.
Conclusion
The OT professional cybersecurity services market presents a compelling investment opportunity, driven by:
- Strong long-term demand drivers, including IT/OT convergence, evolving cyber threats, stricter cyber insurance standards, regulatory mandates and a critical talent shortage in OT security
- Low competition from traditional IT security providers, positioning OT security as a niche but highly lucrative market
- Strong differentiation opportunities and high barriers to entry
Within OT security’s professional services segment, the GRC service line stands out as a key investment opportunity, offering sizeable market spend, predictable reoccurring revenues, rising outsourcing trends and ample scope for differentiation.
How L.E.K. can help
We help investors evaluate asset readiness, commercial positioning and compliance scalability in OT security. Whether your organisation needs diligence, value creation planning or sector landscaping, we bring industry depth and transaction rigour.
“As OT systems become the front line of cybersecurity threats, the winners will be those that can blend deep domain expertise with tailored, scalable services. The next wave of value creation lies in enabling trust and resilience across critical industries.”
— Romain Maitret, Technology Partner
L.E.K. Consulting is a registered trademark of L.E.K. Consulting LLC. All other products and brands mentioned in this document are properties of their respective owners. © 2025 L.E.K. Consulting LLC